Regulación Somática

Healing Does Not Mean Becoming Who You Were

Healing Does Not Mean Becoming Who You Were Recovery as a New Relationship with Life When we talk about healing from trauma, we often imagine that there...

Por Sentido Somático • 16 min
Healing Does Not Mean Becoming Who You Were

Healing Does Not Mean Becoming Who You Were Recovery as a New Relationship with Life When we talk about healing from trauma, we often imagine that there will eventually come a moment when everything that happened will stop affecting us. As though healing meant erasing the traces of the past. As though one day we could wake up and discover that what we experienced no longer exists within us. But perhaps recovery does not work exactly that way. Perhaps healing does not mean becoming who we were before the experience that transformed us. Perhaps it means developing new possibilities for relating to ourselves, our bodies, other people, and life. Because some experiences profoundly change the way we move through the world. A loss. Abuse. A violent relationship. Abandonment. A childhood marked by insecurity. Illness. War. An accident. Or simply years of living in circumstances where our organism had to remain adapted for too long to something overwhelming. After certain experiences, the world may no longer feel the same. We may become more vigilant. More sensitive. More distrustful. We may have difficulty resting. Setting boundaries. Feeling safe in a relationship. Recognizing our own needs. Or even knowing what we feel. This does not mean that we are broken. It means that our organism learned. It learned to respond in a particular way to the circumstances it encountered.

And what may once have been necessary for protection can continue appearing even after circumstances have changed. Here begins one of the most important questions in any recovery process: Can we learn something new without having to fight against what we learned in order to survive? Contemporary research on trauma, stress, and neuroplasticity offers an increasingly interesting answer. The brain is not a completely fixed structure. Experience can influence its functioning and connections. And throughout life, there are also possibilities for change and adaptation. Neuroimaging studies have found differences associated with threat processing, emotional regulation, memory, and cognitive control in people exposed to adversity or living with post-traumatic stress disorder. But this is where we need to pause. The fact that the brain can change does not mean that we can simply "reprogram" it. It does not mean that everyone responds in the same way. Nor does it mean that there is a single technique capable of producing specific neurological changes. Neuroplasticity is not a magical promise. It is a property of the nervous system that allows it to adapt to experience. And this capacity can participate both in processes that support us and in patterns that eventually limit our possibilities. For this reason, recovery involves something much deeper than trying to eliminate symptoms. It involves creating new experiences. New associations. New ways of responding. New possibilities for connection. And, little by little, a different experience of ourselves. Perhaps healing is not about returning to where we were. Perhaps it is about being able to inhabit our lives from a wider place. Science Explains The Brain Can Change, but Change Does Not Happen in Only One Way Neuroplasticity has become one of the best-known concepts when we talk about trauma and recovery. And for good reason. For a long time, there was an excessively rigid view of the adult brain.

It was thought that once certain structures and connections had been established, the possibilities for change were very limited. Today we know that this is not the case. The brain continues adapting to experience throughout life. We learn. We remember. We develop skills. We modify habits. We adapt to new environments. And our experiences can influence the activity and organization of different neural networks. This also happens after traumatic experiences. Prolonged exposure to threat or stress can be associated with changes in systems involved in threat detection, memory, and emotional regulation. A large review of neuroimaging studies found associations between adverse experiences and changes in amygdala reactivity and prefrontal regions, particularly among adults exposed to significant threats or trauma. This helps us understand something fundamental. The organism does not consciously "decide" to develop a trauma response. It learns from what it experiences. If certain stimuli were associated with danger for a long time, the nervous system may become especially sensitive to signals that resemble what once represented a threat. Vigilance makes sense from this perspective. So does heightened sensitivity. Difficulty relaxing. The need to control. The tendency to anticipate what might go wrong. These responses can all be understood as attempts at protection. They are not necessarily failures. They are learned strategies. The difficulty arises when they continue operating long after the original threat has disappeared. Then what once helped protect us can begin limiting our present experience. We may be safe and still feel in danger. We may be with a loving person and expect rejection. We may be in a peaceful place and feel that we need to remain alert. We may receive affection and not know how to receive it. Here, a fundamental dimension of recovery emerges. It is not simply about telling the brain: "There is no danger anymore." The organism may need sufficiently repeated and meaningful experiences that allow it to learn something different.

Safety cannot always be explained. Sometimes it needs to be experienced. What Does It Mean, Then, That the Brain Can Change? It means that learned patterns are not necessarily unchangeable. But it does not mean that we can control them at will. Recovery is a dynamic process. It can include moments of progress. Periods of stagnation. Even moments when a person feels as though they are moving backward. This does not necessarily mean that the process has failed. Living systems do not change in a perfectly linear way. And recovery after a traumatic experience does not follow a single trajectory. Research on resilience shows precisely this diversity. Some people develop intense symptoms immediately after a traumatic experience and later recover. Others experience symptoms for years. Some show relatively few symptoms from the beginning. And others may experience difficulties much later. Longitudinal neuroimaging studies suggest that different patterns of brain activity and connectivity may be associated with resilience and recovery, although these mechanisms are still being investigated and cannot be used to simply predict an individual's trajectory. This diversity matters. Because it reminds us that there is no single "correct" way to heal. Experience Gives Meaning Perhaps We Do Not Need to Erase Our Story There is a very common idea about healing: "I need to move on from my past." But what does it really mean to move on from an experience? We cannot erase that it happened. We cannot become someone who never lived through it. And perhaps we do not need to. Our story is part of us. But being part of our story does not mean that it has to direct our present. An experience may have left a deep imprint without becoming our destiny forever. Perhaps recovery consists precisely in developing a different relationship with that story. We can remember without being there again.

We can feel sadness without becoming completely absorbed by it. We can recognize fear without allowing it to make every decision for us. We can establish boundaries without living permanently on the defensive. We can move toward other people without abandoning our own protection. We can begin to recognize: "This happened." And at the same time: "This is happening now." These two experiences can coexist. The past can exist. And so can the present. This distinction may seem simple. But for a nervous system that learned to constantly respond to danger, it can represent profound learning. Because recovery is not always about convincing the mind. Sometimes it is about experiencing, again and again, that the present contains possibilities that were not available before. Practice Transforms An Invitation to Notice What Has Already Changed When we are going through a recovery process, we can make a very human mistake. We look only at what still hurts. What still triggers a reaction. What we still cannot do. And we stop noticing everything that is already different. I invite you to try a simple practice. You do not need to close your eyes if that does not feel comfortable. Look around you. Find three things you can see. Two sounds you can hear. And one physical sensation you can notice. You do not need to look for a pleasant sensation. Simply notice one that is present. Perhaps the contact of your feet with the ground. The temperature of the air. The movement of your breathing. The weight of your body against a chair. Now observe for a few moments. You are here. You do not need to tell yourself that you are completely safe. You do not need to convince yourself that everything is okay.

Simply recognize: "I am here, in this moment." Then ask yourself: "What can I do today that perhaps I could not do several years ago?" It may be something very small. Saying no. Asking for help. Resting without feeling that you have to earn it. Recognizing that something makes you uncomfortable. Choosing who you want to be with. Stepping away from a situation that does not feel good for you. Allowing someone to come closer. Or simply noticing that you can now recognize a reaction that once completely overwhelmed you. That is also change. Sometimes recovery does not appear as a great transformation. It appears as a small space between what happens and how we respond. One second longer before reacting. A breath. A choice. A possibility. That space may seem small. But it can contain an enormous difference. Because perhaps freedom does not mean no longer feeling. Perhaps it means having more possibilities for what to do with what we feel. Research Continues Science is beginning to understand more deeply what happens in the brain and body during recovery after trauma. We know that evidence-based psychological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder can be associated with changes in certain processes related to emotional regulation and brain functioning. But the picture is more complex than it is sometimes presented. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies found limited and inconsistent evidence regarding certain brain changes following effective PTSD treatments. Some studies observed changes in prefrontal regions, while other expected changes—such as a consistent reduction in amygdala activation—could not be established convincingly. This matters. Because it means that we cannot simply say that healing trauma consists of "calming the amygdala," "activating the prefrontal cortex," or "reprogramming the brain."

These expressions may be useful as educational metaphors. But they do not describe the full complexity of human recovery. More recent research continues to explore the relationship between brain circuits involved in threat, attention, memory, and emotional regulation. Researchers are also investigating how different treatments may influence neurobiological processes. A recent systematic review highlights growing evidence concerning biological mechanisms associated with psychotherapeutic change, including processes involving emotional regulation, stress regulation, the autonomic nervous system, and immune functioning, while also emphasizing important limitations in sample sizes, study designs, and biomarker measurements. Science therefore offers us something more interesting than an absolute answer. It offers us a direction. We know that the nervous system has the capacity to adapt. We know that experience matters. We know that psychological treatments can produce meaningful improvements for many people. We know that resilience and recovery are possible. And we know that we still do not fully understand how all of this happens. That last part matters too. Because acknowledging what we do not yet know is a form of rigor. And rigor does not have to take the beauty out of healing. On the contrary. It can help us move away from exaggerated promises and toward a much more grounded form of hope. Healing Does Not Mean Forgetting Perhaps one of the most important ideas we can take from this exploration is that healing from trauma does not necessarily mean forgetting what happened. It does not mean that we will never again feel fear, sadness, anger, or pain. And it does not mean becoming a perfectly regulated version of ourselves. We are human beings. We will continue to have moments of vulnerability. We will continue to encounter difficult situations. There will be days when our nervous system responds more intensely. Recovery does not remove our humanity. It can expand our capacity to relate to it. We can learn to recognize our signals earlier. To ask for support. To set boundaries. To return to the present.

To rest. To feel. To choose. To relate differently. To recognize that a reaction makes sense without allowing it to completely determine our behavior. And, little by little, we may begin to discover something that may have been there from the beginning: We are not only what happened to us. We are also what we have learned. What we have created. The relationships we have built. The decisions we have made. The new experiences we have allowed. And the possibilities we have not yet discovered. A New Relationship With Ourselves Perhaps this is why I prefer to speak of recovery rather than "becoming who you were." Because there is no real place to return to. Life transforms us. Trauma can transform us. Relationships transform us. Grief transforms us. Illness transforms us. Love transforms us too. We cannot live through a profound experience and emerge exactly the same. So the question can change. No longer: "How do I become who I was?" But: "Who can I become now?" This question creates space. It does not demand perfection. It does not demand forgetting. It does not demand that we stop feeling. It invites us to discover new possibilities. Perhaps a person who spent years needing to control everything can gradually learn to tolerate some uncertainty. Perhaps someone who never felt able to say no can begin recognizing their boundaries.

Perhaps someone who learned to disconnect from their needs can begin listening to them. Perhaps someone who lived for years expecting abandonment can begin experiencing relationships where presence is possible. Not because the past disappears. But because the present begins to offer new experiences. And new experiences also become part of us. The Practice Continues You do not need to ask yourself every day whether you are completely healed. That question can become another form of pressure. You can ask something simpler: "Do I have a little more space today than I did before?" Space to breathe. Space to feel. Space to choose. Space to say no. Space to say yes. Space to ask for help. Space to rest. Space to be with someone. Space to be with yourself. Sometimes recovery looks exactly like that. Not feeling good all the time. But having more space to experience life as it comes. With its moments of pleasure. Its losses. Its uncertainties. Its relationships. Its challenges. Its contradictions. And with our growing capacity to remain present within all of it. The Research Behind This Article Contemporary research on trauma and recovery shows that adverse experiences can be associated with changes in different brain systems involved in threat, memory, attention, and emotional regulation. We also know that the brain retains the capacity to adapt throughout life. This capacity, known as neuroplasticity, allows experience to influence the organization and functioning of different neural circuits. However, neuroplasticity does not mean that we can consciously control every change in the brain.

Nor does it mean that a particular practice can "reprogram" the brain in a specific way. Trauma recovery is multidimensional. It can include psychological, behavioral, relational, and physiological changes, and likely involves multiple systems interacting with one another. Research into effective PTSD treatments has found changes associated with recovery, but these findings are not completely uniform, and important questions remain regarding the specific neurobiological mechanisms of change. For this reason, at Sentido Somático we prefer language that leaves room both for the possibility of change and for scientific humility. The body can learn. The nervous system can adapt. People can recover. But no recovery process is identical to another. What We Know Today We know that traumatic experiences can have lasting effects on the way some people respond to stress and process signals associated with threat. We know that there are enormous individual differences in how people respond to adversity. We know that resilience and recovery are dynamic processes. We know that the brain retains the capacity to adapt throughout life. And we know that evidence-based psychological treatments can help many people living with post-traumatic stress disorder. We also know that not everyone needs the same thing. There is no single way to heal trauma. There is no single recovery trajectory. And there is no single explanation that can fully encompass each person's experience. What We Are Still Learning We are still investigating exactly how experience, the brain, the autonomic nervous system, the immune system, hormones, memory, and social context interact during recovery. We are also learning why some people develop remarkable resilience after extremely difficult experiences while others experience persistent symptoms. Research on neuroplasticity continues to grow. So does research into body-oriented interventions and how bodily experiences may participate in processes of regulation. But it is important not to move ahead of the evidence.

The fact that an intervention produces a sense of well-being does not necessarily mean that we know exactly which neurobiological changes are taking place. And the fact that a theory is plausible does not mean that it has been clinically demonstrated. Science needs time. It needs studies. It needs replication. And it needs the humility to say: "We do not know yet." Our Commitment At Sentido Somático, we deeply believe in the human capacity for change. But we do not want to turn that hope into a promise. We do not want to tell you that you can erase your trauma. We do not want to tell you that everything is stored in one specific part of the body. We do not want to tell you that a particular practice will "reprogram" your brain. And we do not want to tell you that if you still experience symptoms, it means you have not worked hard enough on yourself. We prefer something simpler. We believe that people can develop new possibilities. That the body can learn. That relationships can offer different experiences. That the nervous system can adapt. That we can build resources. And that, with appropriate support, many people can experience meaningful recovery. Perhaps healing does not mean returning to where we were. Perhaps it means discovering that our story can remain part of us without having to direct every chapter of our lives. Because we are not only what happened to us. We are also everything we may still experience. And perhaps recovery begins when we stop asking: "How do I become who I was?" And slowly begin asking: "What new possibilities for living are available to me now?" That question does not demand that we erase the past. It simply creates space for the future. And perhaps that is one of the deepest forms of healing. Not returning. Expanding.